deviant art

Deviant Login Shop
 Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
×

Shop Similar Prints

More from *FramedByNature


×

3,858

385 104 0
Canon EOS 5D mk1
Canon 50mm f/1.4

Shot this back in September of 2010 near North Bend, NE with *Nebraskies. The air was incredibly crisp and clear that night, making it easy to see the Milky Way with the naked eye. Not sure if the small streak just above the house is a plane, satellite, or meteor. My guess would be an iridium flare off of a satellite. The abandoned house in the foreground made for a fantastic scene. Can't wait to get out again and shoot more star photos!

Please tell me what you think! :dance:

Details

Stats

Submitted on
February 21, 2011
Image Size
496 KB
Resolution
1000×667
Views
3,858
Favourites
385 (who?)
Comments
104

Camera Data

Make
Canon
Model
Canon EOS 5D
Shutter Speed
20/1 second
Aperture
F/1.4
Focal Length
50 mm
ISO Speed
3200
Date Taken
September 11, 2010
Software
Adobe Photoshop CS5 Macintosh
Sensor Size
8mm
URL
Thumb
Embed
Only verified accounts can report policy violations. Please check your email and click on the verification link.
* Required field
Add a Comment:
 
love 7 7 joy 3 3 wow 2 2 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0
:iconframedbynature:
*FramedByNature Mar 18, 2011  Student Photographer
Thank you so much! :aww:
Reply
:icontmphotographia:
~TMPhotographia Feb 27, 2011  Student Photographer
For the record, my original comment got lost in a firefox crash...

This was wonderfully captured and it turned out very beautiful. The foreground however needs some tweaking. It isn't badly composed, in fact the composition in the frame is great. What does bother me is the fact that it is not entirely sharp and it is lit just enough to where you can see hints of the house's detail. I think it would look much better if you were to do either two things. One would to have been to either use another exposure for the foreground and get the house decently lit with possibly even a smaller aperture (to make sure it is all sharp and in focus). You could either use the natural light of the stars/moon or you could illuminate it yourself with either flashes or anything else that would illuminate it (I think it would look better with you illuminating it). The other option is to go back in post and burn out the details of the house making it a pure silhouette. With the small bits of detail there it becomes way too distracting and doesn't make the shot as good as it could be in my opinion.

I apologize if any points were confusing, I just didn't have the effort to think thought my phrasing as much.
Reply
:iconframedbynature:
*FramedByNature Mar 10, 2011  Student Photographer
Thank you. Lighting it with a flashlight would have been possible. However, my friend was doing a timelapse of the stars behind the house, so I didn't want to screw up his images. No way I could have exposed it any lighter, this was at f/1.4, ISO 3200 at 20 seconds. Guess I could have done 30 seconds but like you said, even then not a lot of the house would be in focus. I kept that bit of detail in there because it keeps the image balanced. If I burned out the detail, wouldn't it look a little heavy on the bottom? Guess I could try :)
Reply
:icontmphotographia:
~TMPhotographia Apr 14, 2011  Student Photographer
Sorry on the late reply...
I understand that you couldn't artificially light it, that makes sense. What I would do since you couldn't artificially light it would to use the bulb setting to get the exposure over 30 seconds, and even though it will make the exposure a ton longer, use a wider aperture than f/1.4 (I'd say f/4 at least).
That is completely my opinion though :shrug:

As for burning everything in I would have to agree with you. I took the liberty of burning it in myself and it does make it oddly bottom-heavy.
Reply
:iconnicky-the-dragoness:
~Nicky-the-dragoness Feb 24, 2011  Hobbyist Digital Artist
christ.
in.
heaven.

I just...

i can't describe what kind of amazing shot this is. it is just..

YEAH OMG SO GOOD.
Reply
:iconframedbynature:
*FramedByNature Feb 24, 2011  Student Photographer
Thank you ;)
Reply
:iconnicky-the-dragoness:
~Nicky-the-dragoness Feb 25, 2011  Hobbyist Digital Artist
welcomes :3
Reply
:iconcat34215:
Mood: Joy ~Cat34215 Feb 23, 2011  Hobbyist Photographer
cute
Reply
:iconframedbynature:
*FramedByNature Feb 24, 2011  Student Photographer
:)
Reply
:iconrabbiten:
~rabbiten Feb 23, 2011  Hobbyist Photographer
you've been featured here :D [link]
Reply
Add a Comment: